Workers suffer again

PRESIDENT of the National Trade Union Centre (NATUC), Ro-bert Giuseppi yesterday stated that the economic policies adopted by the government were putting workers in jeopardy.

Giuseppi was res-ponding to reporters on the issue of the possible retrenchment of workers at BWIA, following a press conference held at City Hall, Knox Street, Port-of-Spain Wednes-day. Giuseppi noted that for the last ten years, NATUC has been saying that the economic policies of government after government, continued to put workers in jeopardy. On the issue of BWIA, Giuseppi stated that the issue had to be addressed from a different perspective than what is happening today or what happened yesterday.  He lashed out at UNC politicians, who he said have jumped on the band-wagon, to try to make some political mileage off of BWIA. He advised that they should look at the economic policies that they themselves followed when they were in power. Economic policies that seemed to state, that the private sector is a God send, and is able to solve all the economical problems in Trinidad and Tobago.

Asked if he thought that Chief Executive Officer of BWIA Con-rad Aleong was being used as a scape-goat by the politicians, Giuseppi replied, “even if Aleong is a scape-goat, he is a rich one. It is the workers that are suffering.” “If Conrad Aleong has to go, he will be a millionaire, if the workers have to go, they leave penniless. This is what we call Industrial execution,” Giuseppi said. He advised the government to look at the BWIA issue in the context of “who is suffering from this” and not take the issue and sensationalise it in the media. “Looking at it in the more global context, privatisation has failed. Government has incited on following this type of policy and failed. Following, the World Bank and the IMF have not worked for Trinidad and Tobago.”

Giuseppi also stated that contract work is another option that will not work. “Public enterprises, public services and public operations and functions must be done by public paid employees, and government has to take the responsibility to make it a success. “If the private sector employers think they can make it a success, then why can’t the business men in public sector make it a success,” questioned Giuseppi. He pointed out that the only time enterprises such as WASA got into problems, was when politicians interfered and created problems. He stated, “these things constantly occurred because the government was blindly following an economic policy that was not good for the working class people, and developing countries like Trinidad and Tobago.”

Chutney video for MTV viewers

THE NATIONAL Chutney Foundation of Trinidad and Tobago (NCFTT) is presently working towards producing a $750,000 video production that would be aired to over 1.1 billion viewers world-wide via MTV India.

This was explained by NCFTT’s Chairman, Vijay Ramlal, during a press conference held at City Hall, Knox Street,  Port-of-Spain on Tuesday, to announce a merger between the National Trade Union Centre (NATUC), the National Cultural Promotions of Trinidad and Tobago (NCP) and NCFTT. The proposal to produce the two hour production was made by MTV India and is based on the NCFTT”s ability to present a two hour international standard video production. Ramlal stated that this is an honour for the NCFTT and is the first time in the country’s history that something like this has been done. He said that the NCFF has held discussions with the Minister of Culture and the Director of Culture, and noted that although it is a National Chutney Monarch Competition, they would include other aspects of the national culture including pan, calypso, parang and ragga at the finals of the competition. In addition the edited version of the video will feature snippets of scenic parts of Trinidad and Tobago, so that people who see this production, will not only see the variety of culture that TT possess, but also the scenic beauty of the country.

Ramlal explained that the NCFTT is still in dialogue with TIDCO and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism on how best to package this production. He also noted that the Foundation was seeking MTV India’s assistance to have MTV Canada and America show this production on their network. At present the NCFTT is footing the bill to produce the entire production. However, the NCFTT is in negotiation with MTV India to make the production a financial tradeoff for 2004. At present the video production is costing $750,000, with $288,000 of that figure towards payment of prizes. Ramlal explained that several members of the corporate sector have come on-board to assist with the funding of the competition. However the NCFTT is hoping that they re-consider their financial commitment, based on the figure that is now required to have the production completed.

With regard to the merger between the union and the NCFTT, Ramlal explained that this combination marks a new approach to our social and cultural contract with the people of TT. President/General of NATUC, Robert Giuseppi stated that his union saw this venture as the first of many opportunities for the union and the entertainment industry.He noted that the country did not have any infrastructure for culture and this was one of the projects the union would be working on. He said that entertainers in Trinidad and Tobago were not being given the opportunity to make a real living. He said that in the other 20-20 societies the entertainers make money, while our entertainers have to beg and scrape to make ends meet. Giuseppi issued a call for other members of the entertainment industry to consider a merger with the union for the betterment of the industry.

Chaguanas woman threatens TTEC

Anastasia Guy of  7 Flora Terrace, Dass Trace, Enterprise, Chaguanas claims that TTEC is not respecting her rights as a land owner. According to Guy, there is a leaning TTEC electricity pole just outside her front wall. She claims that the lines pass through her fruit trees.

Guy says that workers from the tree trimming department of TTEC attempted to trim her trees for the third time on Wednesday. She added that the workers produced an official document that authorised the trimming exercise. “Since 1981 I having problems with TTEC, but they cannot touch my trees!” she said. Guy threatened to take serious action against the workers and their employer if they cut the trees without her approval.

Dumas’ elusive games

CLEARLY Minister of Public Utilities Rennie Dumas has problems with answering questions directed to him in the House. For the third time this year we must point out to the Minister that his responsibility is to answer such questions as promptly and as fully as possible and be prepared also to reply to supplementary questions that may logically arise from his answers. Last January, we were critical of Mr Dumas for his inability after seven weeks to answer some straightforward questions posed by Opposition Senator Wade Mark about WASA’s operations. In March we again had cause to criticise the Minister, this time for his most inadequate answer to Opposition MP Ganga Singh’s questions about payments made by WASA in settling a number of legal matters.

Last Tuesday in the Senate, Minister Dumas was again playing elusive games with answering questions. This time he was asked by Senator Mark for the number of persons, their names and professions, qualfication and experience, who comprise the panel appointed by the Solid Waste Management Company to select companies/contractors for CEPEP projects. Instead of answering the question fully, Mr Dumas chose to identify panel members simply by their positions and qualifications, omitting to give their names. When asked why he had done this, Mr Dumas produced an unbelievable reply. He said: “Given the vilification of this programme by the Opposition throughout the country, the danger is that the individuals can become individual targets, not in their public function. We are asking the House to accept identification through the positions.” How naive can this Minister get? Does he not realise that the whole purpose of the question is to find out the personal identities, by way of names, of those appointed to the panel and that the Opposition would insist on having them?

In any case, these are persons appointed by the state-owned SWMCOL to select CEPEP contractors and the Minister is duty bound to reveal them when asked to do so in parliament. It is quite ridiculous for him to conceal their names because he feels they should be protected from opposition vilification. If members of the panel are well chosen and if the Government believes in the purpose and integrity of its CEPEP scheme, then why worry about opposition “vilification”? In such a case, in fact, we would believe that naming members of the panel would be one sure way of refuting the vilifiers. On the other hand, by seeking to hide the names Mr Dumas may be inviting another kind of intepretation and strengthening the feeling of CEPEP critics. It is quite absurd also for the Minister to ask the Senate to accept his decision, and his reasons for doing so, in refusing  to answer the Opposition question as required. It is painful to have to remind Mr Dumas that there can be no hedging in answering questions in Parliament, that the demands upon him and other ministers to be accountable and transparent with respect to operations of the government are undeniable and uncompromising.

Finally, even Mr Dumas should by now be aware of the growing desperation among the ranks of opposition parliamentarians, some of whom appear hell bent on the creation of confusion and turmoil. What really is the objective behind all this unwarranted disrespect and defiance by senior representatives is, as yet, hard to tell but we must regard these angry and ill-founded outbursts as presenting a troubling development in our country. At a time when crime and indiscipline among our young people are cause for major concern, some parliamentarians choose to set the very worst examples. Minister Dumas should not want to provoke their self-righteous wrath any further.

Accident with traffic lights


Another long weekend of fetes, parties, beach limes, family gatherings, prayer meetings and solemn celebrations of Indian arrival looms ahead as Casualty in Port-of-Spain General and San Fernando (among other health facilities) brace for the cases of shootings, stabbings and the inevitable smashed and mangled bodies when drivers “lose control” of motor vehicles. Too often, it isn’t the driver who “lost control,” who is carried into Casualty — or the mortuary — when the car, like a runaway horse, took the metaphorical bit between its teeth to overtake on a blind corner, swerve, skid, jump the median, slam into — or cartwheel to land on top of — another car going in the opposite direction (ie when the driver who “lost control” was speeding/DUI/reckless — and/or a combination of all three). I hope no Newsday reader will go through what I experienced in April 1981 when there was an “outage” in El Socorro that was a contributory factor to, if not the actual cause of, the accident that prompted me to write: “As I left the typewriter to answer the phone I wondered who could be calling me at 10 o’clock in the morning. Was it a friend with a choice bit of gossip? A neighbour or a total stranger begging me to write more about the water situation? Perhaps it was a fellow field naturalist reporting yet another ecological disaster for me to investigate? More likely, a wrong number?

I picked up the phone, “Hello?” I said. Oh, how I hate the way those unknown people who don’t bother to check a number, or made an error in dialling,  slam down the phone without one word of apology when I reply by saying my number. Mind you, in these days Telco may be at fault (it often is) — but at least the caller who interrupted my train of thought at the typewriter, or in the middle of cooking, or half-way through a shower (among other bathroom activities) might have said s/he was sorry. However, this call wasn’t a wrong number.“Mrs Hilton?” inquired a voice I didn’t know. “Yes?” “Hold for a call.” I held, wondering all the while which business, bank or government office needed to talk to me. The call was put through, my caller told me she is the Chief Personnel Officer in the firm where my husband was working. “I don’t want to alarm you . . .” she began after she’d told me who she was. Fortunately, I was sitting down. The next words I remember were “accident, El Socorro Crossing, Port-of-Spain General Hospital.”

Pausing only to shed my shorts and don a pair of long pants, I drove to Port-of-Spain General, all the while thanking God that we lived so near the hospital, praying that my husband wasn’t badly injured, and remembering the “Dial 999” telecast of two evenings before and the warnings about dangerous driving, especially at crossings where the traffic lights aren’t working because of an “outage”. And that my husband is such a careful driver. And how I’ve always hated that highway. From then on there is only a series of impressions . . . Casualty. My husband’s blood-soaked shirt. The drip — TV calls it an IV. The doctors bent over him. The police asking “What is his name? Where does he live?” The nurse directing me to sit in the waiting room — where there was nowhere to sit with my daughter and the gentleman and lady from Personnel who were telling me not to worry about the car or the legal details or anything else except my husband now lying on a trolley waiting for X-ray.”(2003 Even now, remembering that morning, my heart beats faster, my blood pressure rises (?) as I type these words into the computer.) The waiting and the fearing and the hoping as he was wheeled out of X-ray and back into the examining room. The doctor says “This is only a preliminary diagnosis. The surgeons are with him.”

The clerk registering my husband’s formal admission into hospital snaps, “Don’t touch those papers!” when the sympathetic hospital porter was ready to take him up to the ward. And the waiting with my husband, still lying on the trolley in a crowded corridor, six stitches in his head, four, perhaps five broken ribs . . The brown paper under his head bringing home to me the doctors’ and nurses’ protests. . . At last, the walk behind the trolley through the corridors and up in the lift to Ward 24. He lies in the bed, the stained shirt, his trousers and socks partly covered with a sheet. “No, we’re leaving him to rest. We’ll change him as soon as he’s over the worst of the shock.” That makes sense. I stand beside the bed. He opens his eyes. I say “I love you.” There is nothing more I can say. He is alive. By the mercy of God, he is alive.

This is the reality of a traffic accident. This happened to me last week (April 1981). For your own sakes, drive carefully today. For your wife, your children’s, your loved one’s sakes, drive safely today — and every day . . .” For the record, a friend who passed by the scene of the accident, not knowing that John, my husband, was a victim, told us later that he’d said to his fellow passenger, “I’ll bet no one got out of that alive” — for there were two other victims: the driver and passenger of the van that slammed broadside on into John’s car is he crossed that junction from South to North. Tragically, defensive driving is no defence against the drunk driver — or the sober speed fanatic. Take it slow-er, remember the old adage, “better late than never”, stick to fruit punch — or soda and Angostura bitters. Drive as if your life (and the lives of those you love) depended on it this weekend – because it does.

Let’s fight destroyers of the environment

THE EDITOR: Dr Mahabir Maharajh in his article entitled “Stop these demon truck drivers!” asked, and I quote, “And why is it that no one says a word?” Dr Maharajh was referring to the “nightmarish” trucking which persists in the Maracas Valley and Riverside Road — night and day. I have already published in the newspapers, two letters about the monster that is destroying the Maracas Valley. These letters refer not only to the “demonic and discourteous truck drivers!” as described in Dr Maharajh’s letter but to the activities responsible — the illegal quarrying, both in the watershed of the valley (the foothills of El Tucuche) as well as on the main road within a residential area — the Maracas Royal Road. These activities have been taking place in this Valley for several years despite the fact that the Maracas Valley (in particular the foothills which include EL Tucuche) was declared a protected area by the government.

As a result of this correspondence, the area was visited on at least two occasions by an official of the Prime Minister’s office. Subsequently, there was a notable decline in these operations. However, this was very short-lived and the destruction of the valley and the flouting of the law continues unabated and seemingly with no objection on the part of the responsible authority. I wish to express my joy in reading Dr Maharajh’s letter and in seeing someone else take up the fight against those destroyers of the environment of a once well-watered and unusually beautiful valley. And I take the liberty of offering Dr Maharajh not only my support but the support of those valley residents who in previous years, when an authority was a responsible body dutifully enforcing the law, enjoyed living in a valley rich in flora and fauna, boasting one of the island’s most prolific crystal-clear rivers — now reduced to nothing more than a sewer-type drain void of the flourishing bamboo-banks and fish life (river lobsters, crayfish, crabs, sardines, catfish, etc)  — that once abounded.


EVE ANDERSON
Maracas Valley

Time to punish those reckless drivers

THE EDITOR: In an ongoing endeavour to rid our roads of the “reckless driver” especially the ones who operate the ‘maxi taxi’, this writer suggests that government, as a matter of urgency, seriously consider the introduction of plainclothes licencing and police officers whose main function would be to simply pose as commuters observing the drivers style and behaviour and if this driver breaks the law in any way, they will be appropriately fined “on the spot.” In addition, if the offence is serious enough to warrant an immediate arrest then “so be it,” off the driver goes right there and then. Sounds tough? Well it’s meant to be. The road madness has gone too far and must be stopped now! And by any means. Think about it Mr PM and Transport Commissioner, at least it’s a start in the right direction and it will take drastic measures to correct this problem. While I agree that there is an expense to taxpayers attached, I don’t believe they would mind and in any event governments today and those previous have spent millions in areas of unimportance. Yes? Think about it gentlemen, these measures may even act as a deterrent which will have the “road hog” think twice.

G WILDMAN
Glencoe

Mr Gupta, food festival not for all

THE EDITOR: Please permit me space in your editorial to view my thoughts. I read recently in the newspaper that the Indian High Commissioner, Mr Gupta requested that Air India or rather airlines look into the matter of reducing their fares to India to enable visitors to travel there and experience the warmth of that lovely country. I agree whole-heartedly, since I myself have visited that exotic country on three occasions and have found India to be enchanting. I, however, was a bit perturbed to read in another advertisement His Excellency Mr Gupta in conjunction with Air India and Hilton Hotel is hosting an Indian Food Festival and are inviting people to attend this dinner to experience and enjoy the cuisine of India, at a cost of $245 plus 10 percent service charge per person ($24.50) and 15 percent VAT ($40.42). Total cost per person works about $309.92 per person. If I decide to go to this dinner, I will of course go with my husband, and that would cost $618.84. 

Granted the price of things has escalated in the last year, astronomically, but Mr Gupta, with all due respect to you Sir, this food festival is only catering for a certain sector of the smaller man who is not so travelled and who would relish the idea of tasting foods that are indigenous to India. Give them the taste of India, those who cannot afford to go there.  Touch their lives. Please Mr Gupta think about having the dinner next year maybe at the Nagar Site or elsewhere at an affordable price. Have both individual prices and family prices so that entire families can enjoy. I am sure the turn out will touch your heart.

R BOODAN
Valsayn

‘TT, support the disabled!’

THE EDITOR: I am amazed that the protest being carried on outside the National Flour Mills on Wrightson Road has been given so little publicity and has got so little attention from the general public. This group of handicapped people are very courageous. They are not asking for a handout (as is being done by so many able-bodied members of the community). They are only asking that they be given the opportunity to work and earn an honest living. It is high time that the government and members of the public and private sectors become more aware of the needs of the disabled. I am, therefore, appealing to the Trinidad and Tobago Manufacturing Association, The Chambers of Commerce, both in the north and south, members of Amchan, and the many public and private companies, government offices, hotels, shops etc to make an effort to look around, as I am sure that with a little adjustment and training someone with a disability can be given occupation. Because someone has a disability, it does not mean that they are retarded or unable to function mentally.

I have always admired Peake’s Industries in Cocorite for giving a number of persons confined to wheelchairs, jobs in their assembly plant, and I only wish that there were more people out there who would follow their example. Well done Peake’s, you are a beacon of hope and encouragement to the disabled. Come on Trinidad and Tobago, become more sensitive to the needs of the less fortunate members of our community and come out in support of these people.


J G MAC LEAN
Goodwood Heights
Diego Martin

The Fourth Test Success

THE EDITOR: We had lost three test matches.
Had dropped so many catches.
Things looked terrible — gosh
We might be in for a whitewash.

Then came the fourth test in Antigua.
The Aussies were set to beleaguer.
The West Indies team once more
Of this they were quite sure.


Rudder’s ‘Rally round the West Indies’ could be heard.
Four hundred and eighteen runs to make was the word.
A tall order for the West Indies to deliver.
It made us all start to shiver.


Some of us could not bear to watch the screen.
The Aussies were prepared to be mean.
Would they make a clean sweep?
Would we have to gnash our teeth and weep?


This was a crucial time in cricket.
We needed might and mane and wicket.
Would our boys stand up to the test?
All they could do was their best.


Then Chanderpaul hit one hundred and four.
The crowd let out a mighty roar.
The heroic Vasbert Drakes
Hit some boundaries all for our sakes.


To the enterprising Omari Banks,
We owe our eternal thanks.
One hundred and twenty five years of cricketing history made.
The efforts of the West Indies would never fade.


Three cheers for Lara and the boys.
This is why cricket is one of our greatest joys.
Our faith was restored though we lost the series.
We will always ‘Rally round the West Indies.’


 Cynthia Hinkson