Pro-death

The architects of the diabolical are well aware that the sinister and nefarious are most lethal when unleashed under the camouflage of the good and noble...  But in this case, the smokescreen hides nothing — the underwear is exposed... It’s not pro-choice but pro-death! It is no secret that evil best achieves its objective when it comes gift-wrapped or sugar-coated in “good.” We hear of the “wolves in sheep’s clothing” and the “angels of light.” The architects of the diabolical are well aware that the sinister and nefarious are most lethal when unleashed under the camouflage of the good and noble.  The naive and gullible become fatally ensnared when, to him or her, the beguiling fa?ade becomes “harmless and acceptable.” The weapons of choice of the agents of evil have therefore been twisted semantics, euphemisms, code languages, “politically correct” terminologies and “sanitised” agendas. 

Hence, the term homosexuality is now given the more palatable label “alternative lifestyle” or “gay.” Prostitutes are now “commercial sex workers.” Adultery is merely “having an affair.” A woman having a child out of wedlock is supposed to be “celebrating her femininity.” A grossly immoral man, who is callously exploiting the sexuality of women, is celebrated with the  “macho” sobriquet. Similarly, the baby butchering organisations have been trying to mask their bloody, murderous agenda with noble name tags such as “Planned Parenthood” and “Safe Parenthood.” Strangely, if not ridiculously, they have been calling the opposite of pro-life “pro-choice.” There is only one opposite to pro-life and that is pro-death. There is no such thing as pro-choice in the real motive, mission and modus operandi of the pro-abortion gang.  Their thrust is fiercely diabolical and singular — death! The smokescreen hides nothing — the underwear is exposed. They call it “pro-choice,” but they cold-bloodedly butcher the tiny, defenceless baby in a more gruesome manner than a pig in a slaughter house, without allowing the innocent creation of God the slightest chance of a choice, to choose life.

It’s brutal selfishness! All they are concerned with, is that somebody, irrespective of how difficult or inconveniencing it was, allowed them the chance to be born. Now that they have already been born, they are hell-bent on using their right to life — and their pro-death agenda — to deny the purely innocent and defenceless, their most sacred right — the right to life. Somebody may have to forgive me, but, at the risk of being accused of virulence, I must admit, it’s extremely difficult for me not to see pro-abortion/pro-death agents as perhaps the most heinous, malevolent and godless people on the planet. It’s almost impossible for me, having a God-created human conscience, to respect pro-abortion/pro-death agents, or dialogue with them. For me, its tantamount to, or even worse than, negotiating with terrorists. You listen to their rhetoric and it sickens your stomach. There is the most crude contempt for life. Life’s sanctity is overtly and fragrantly mocked. God is scorned and ridiculed in their sarcastic and savage onslaught against the sanctity of life.

The level of repugnance and effrontery that accompany their duplicity, chicanery and specious arguments is amazing. Their aim is to inveigle at any cost. Like a stubborn spider, they continue to weave their treacherous web. They vociferously tout their claim to seeking the welfare of women, despite their full knowledge that baby girls are, by far, aborted more than boys, because the world thinks that women are of less value and worth than men. The pro-abortion/pro-death clan is therefore actually supporting this growing misogynistic practice. With silver tongue and crocodile tears, they claim that their burning passion (or compassion) is to assist poor women to have “safe” abortions, but there is a two-prong dagger hiding under their tongues, as they speak. 

Prong one: The cost of abortions, even if the procedure is decriminalised, would be so prohibitive (since the objective is big bucks) that the pitiful poor would never be able to access these “safe” procedures. Prong two: There is absolutely nothing — may I stress, absolutely nothing! — such as a safe abortion. ASPIRE, in desperation that it has come up against far more informed and enlightened resistance than it expected (despite the avid backing of US “intelligence” and dollars) has begun to grab at straws, or rather nothing, in its attempt to save its already irreparably disfigured face.

Imagine this group has the audacity to deny all the physical and medical complications and trauma suffered by women who have had abortion (including breast cancer which has risen by 50 percent in the US, since abortion was legalised) despite all the overwhelming, credible data that’s available globally. I know ASPIRE is afraid to face the Finland figures published by the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, because facing truth — especially more lately — has become a very painful experience for them.  Nevertheless, the Finland figures reveal that between 1987-2000, pregnancy-associated deaths of the entire population of women 15-49 years of age, the mortality rate associated with abortion was almost 300 percent higher than those associated with pregnancy carried full term. Once again, I say, “This vampire called ASPIRE must expire, without having one single drop of blood from our innocent, God-sent children — or their mothers.”