Why God is knowable

THE EDITOR: I refer to “A Conversation with God” by Kevin Baldeosingh Newsday 12/11/04. Definition: Agnostic:- A person who holds that the existence of the ultimate cause as God, and the essential nature of things are unknown and unknowable or that human knowledge is limited to experience.

Source:- Webster’s Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language.
Agnostic:- A person who holds that only material phenomena can be known and knowledge of a supreme being, ultimate cause etc is impossible.
Source: The Collins English Dictionary

Mr Kevin Lionel Baldeosingh lives in a democracy where freedom of speech is the cornerstone of its Constitution. Mr Baldeosingh is entitled to his opinions even though his opinions are not valid. If human knowledge is limited to experience then Mr Baldeosingh simply has not experienced God. Poor fellow. I do not need anyone be it pope, archbishop, bishop, evangelist or pastor, imam or preacher to tell me about God, why? Because alone and all on my own I met and conversed with God.

I am not a schizo, nor a mad man, in our conversation I was told several things which came to pass. If I have a problem I pose the question to God and within days I get an answer. I would be doing something and suddenly I would feel a quietness in my mind and then I hear a voice talking to me in my head in answer to my question. If human knowledge is limited to experience, I have experienced God and so my knowledge in respect of God’s presence and concern is known and knowable and unlimited. If the being who speaks to me is not God then it is a being who has an existence outside of human terms of material existence and if there is life after death who is going to discipline and command those who live after death?

JACK LEARMOND CRIQUI
Diego Martin