AG’s remarks clear and unambiguous

In reference to the Attorney General’s (AG) remarks at the conference hosted by the Association of Real Estate Agents the previous day, that political commentator gave me the impression that what the AG said amounted to an attempt to subvert our democracy, the Constitution and the rule of law. His view was echoed by UNC spokesmen later that day.

In a story in another newspaper on February 15, Camille Hunte reported that the AG, in commenting on the legislation he intends to bring to Parliament, stated that “90 percent of them have been fashioned so that we don’t need to call upon the Opposition for a three-fifths majority...” However, Hunte also reported that the AG added that the move would not be infringing on any rights.

The AG explained that he was adopting that approach in order to advance the work of the Government, given that since the PNM replaced the UNC in Government, the UNC has been very uncooperative in supporting any legislation which requires a special majority in Parliament, in a concerted attempt to frustrate the work of the Government for political reasons.

The AG never indicated he was going to abolish the existing requirement for certain types of legislation which affects people’s fundamental rights to be passed with a special majority. The AG also did not say that no legislation requiring a special majority will be brought to Parliament. He referred to “90 percent of them.” The AG’s remarks were pellucidly clear and unambiguous.

I dare say that the very negative interpretation given to such innocuous remarks must be seen as contemptuous, very unfortunate and clearly designed to bring the Government, in general, and the AG, in particular, into odium and disrepute.

Louis Winston Williams St Augustine