Dr Rowley said that 40 percent of government revenue was working for the benefit of the country and the rest was feeding upper echelons greed. Why’s the nation and the media not talking about this? Knowing this, the Rowley led PNM still went ahead and imposed additional taxes on citizens – property tax, online tax, increase of fuel prices, replacement of VAT on goods and services putting more of our tax dollars on the table for the merchant class to steal.
Government therefore, isn’t willing or able to seal leakages from the treasury and other places, amounting to the 60 percent of government revenue carted away by capitalist’s greed – party financiers, business blackmailers, white collar embezzlers.
At the town meaning on local government reform, Dr Rowley also called on the Opposition Leader to break the silence on her relationship with a businessman who imported marijuana in chicken parts. And Persad-Bissessar called on the PM to break his silence on his relationship with a businessman who imported US$2 million hidden between ply boards. They both know who Mr Big is, why don’t they as leaders, who claim they’re patriotic to country over self, use the information to get both Mr Bigs behind bars? If these two leaders are afraid to their lives, or to act on what they say they believe about ethics, integrity, honesty, law enforcement, to do the right thing, why are they our leaders? US President Woodrow Wilson said while in office in the early 1900s, “Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately.
Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something.
They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” We in TT have had this problem throughout our lives under independence.
Our leaders are afraid on a rogue business class who rob our treasury with impunity.
As such, is it wise for the head of the national security council to be a politician? The conflict of interest between national interest and personal aspiration to win elections and make a government appear to have national security under control is obvious. That what aggrieves the head of the national security council most, is the price his opponent pays for roti to celebrate the Hindu festival of lights, brings us to wonder, what are the highest pressing concerns for the subordinate members of the national security council? The price they pay for clothes and shoes maybe.
Does government really want money? Who do they want if from, productive people and processes or from the middle and subsistence classes? Why are government’s finance collection processes inordinately trained on the incomes and assets of the middle class and subsistence class? Does it make sense to target meagre middle and low income wages (that government already has an income tap on) to generate billions of dollars to run the country? Does that make sense? If money was oil and gas or water production would it make sense to bore more tap holes in low production wells to get increased raw fuel or water production? Or wouldn’t it make sense to drill new wells to tap new virgin sources of income? Which one makes sense? And wouldn’t it make sense to seal leakages in pipelines to existing high producing sources of income? And to cap off leakages in high producing sources of money? Why isn’t government doing that? Why are they bent on frustrating the public with nuisance taxes? Aren’t they doing that to distress the nation so it focuses on making ends meet, instead of focusing on monitoring on what government does with its tax dollars and national resources, so citizens can resist government transferring their taxes to party financiers and friends?
B JOSEPH via email