Birk Hillman treated with kid gloves
THE decision by the UNC government to deny NIPDEC more responsibilities to effectively do its job on the Piarco Airport project was a recipe for disaster.
It meant denying NIPDEC the duties of project managers and giving and trusting Birk Hillman Consultants (BHC) to guard itself on cost control management and other duties.
It was a case of “himself to himself” which the then government as client of the project accepted.
So said Peter Cateau, the Ministry of Works and Transport client representative yesterday when he continued to be questioned by NIPDEC attorney Christopher Hamel-Smith at the Commission of Inquiry into the Piarco Airport development project.
Cateau said NIPDEC’s specific duty in its contract with the client was to deliver the contract on time, within budget and specifications as well as to supervise BHC. He said BHC wore a number of hats including that of project managers, construction managers and designers, and therefore had in part to also deliver the project on time, within budget and specifications.
He said NIPDEC told the client in order for it to perform its functions effectively, it needed to have additional responsibilities, some of which BHC held, like that of implementing cost control management measures and being project managers.
However the client refused to give NIPDEC those additional responsibilities.
Cateau said it was argued by NIPDEC that without the additional responsibilities it would not be able to be deliver what was expected of it.
Cateau said he was in full agreement with NIPDEC and realised the situation was a recipe for problems and disasters.
He agreed with Hamel-Smith that Government’s refusal to accede to NIPDEC’s request meant it “liked it just so” and NIPDEC’s function to supervise BHC had to be done on the basis that Government was satisfied and trusted BHC totally to guard itself on cost control management.
He said he was directed by his Permanent Secretary Justin Paul to meet with the Solicitor General and NIPDEC’s lawyer to discuss the matter. However he was told by the Solicitor General that the contract between NIPDEC and government could not be changed.
He agreed with Hamel-Smith that it was Government’s choice not to change the contract; a decision he said which was made by John Humphrey as Chairman of the Inter-Ministerial Committee. Asked if he was instructed to treat BHC with kid gloves, Cateau said no. Told that direct testimony from him showed that his and NIPDEC’s hands were tied and the dice were loaded in BHC’s favour, in the instance when he was directed by his minister Sadiq Baksh to rescind a decision in favour of NIPDEC to benefit BHC instead, Cateau said in that context it was a case of treating BHC with kid gloves.
However he insisted that there was only one Peter Cateau on the project, although from evidence before the Commission it appeared at times he was firm and strong in his support of NIPDEC and other times he appeared to be doing things to accommodate BHC.
The inquiry will continue on Monday.