We are told that the decision was made by the Sports Company (SPORTT ) in consultation with Lara, whatever that means.
However, the stadium is owned neither by SPORTT nor Lara.
It is owned by the taxpayers of TT and, hence, there should have been wider consultation in deciding a name for the stand.
Things like TV polls would have been useful in gauging public sentiment. I mean, not even the TT Cricket Board was consulted? In the words of that foxy son of the soil, that’s insulting.
One newspaper reported that the chairman of SPORTT said it was also one of the reasons (naming a stand after Tendulkar) that they were able to convince Tendulkar to attend the opening and play in the match carded for the opening. Sounds like a bribe to me, for a short-term gain that has no lasting benefit, at least not to the people of TT .
In any case, if Tendulkar needed a stand to come for the opening, it shows he has no real interest in this country, so why are we naming a stand after him? (But we may be doing him a disservice — he would have come anyway, and we are being told stories.) But, seriously, was that really the level of thinking that was brought to bear on this matter? Well, folks, it would be nice to have Tendulkar at the opening. How can we get him to come? We’ll name a stand after him. Brilliant! And foolish. But perhaps it was simpler. Lara just said he wanted a stand named after Tendulkar and SPORTT meekly complied? The bigger question is why would anyone, with any national pride, want to name a stand in a national facility after a foreigner? Let us agree that Tendulkar was a great batsman and a very likeable fellow; his presence would certainly add excitement to the opening. So it really is a pity that, due to some people’s short-sightedness, his name has become embroiled in a local controversy.
But national facilities, built with taxpayers’ money, must be named after national heroes, such as Lara.
Of course, if Lara had built the stadium with his own money, he could name any stand whatever he wanted, even the Kim Kardashian Stand, for all I care.
To get an idea of how the public felt, I asked at least a dozen people what they thought about naming a stand after Tendulkar.
Not a single person thought it was a good idea. Some were quite strong in their comments: We have no pride. We have no shame. Whoever decided that should be fired. Pure madness. We do not value our heroes. It’s an insult to our long line of distinguished cricketers. What happen to Ramadhin (Sonny) and Rangie Nanan? And other comments of that ilk.
It is clear that hardly anyone supports the idea of naming a stand after Tendulkar, not when there are so many deserving local heroes, and SPORTT / Lara must rescind that decision.
On a related note, when did the name change from Brian Lara Cricket Stadium to Brian Lara Cricket Academy? I thought this was a public stadium, merely named after one of the world’s best ever batsmen.
But one already gets the distinct impression that Lara is calling the shots, being led to believe that this facility is his to do with what he pleases, rather than one to be used for the public’s benefit. I sincerely hope this is a wrong impression but word on the ground makes me sceptical. Time will tell.
NOEL KALICHARAN via email