Questions on resignation call

This leads me to ask: Was the request for the resignation of the Chief Justice based on an error of judgment on his part? If so, what is the position of the attorneys in situations where judgments of the Appeal Court are overturned by the Privy Council or other courts of higher jurisdiction based on errors of judgment? What is hoped to be achieved by the resignations of the members of the JLSC? Would this result in a resolution of the current impasse surrounding the 53 part-heard matters? Or is it punishment or atonement for errors of judgment on the part of the JLSC? I await enlightenment of these matters.

ALLAN HOWARD Tunapuna