In defence of our democracy

Development in this context is a process of social change, grounded in people’s connectedness with one another and with nature. We better understand it by drawing on perspectives from a wider range of disciplines than economics; especially biology, psychology and sociology, Our country has made unprecedented strides in education and health and, particularly, in improving the material well-being of its citizens.

Yet, people are increasingly disillusioned and restive, hope and promise giving way to alienation.

Frustrated by the time taken for our much vaunted democracy to realise its true potential, we seem not to appreciate that aspirations are fulfilled and sustainable progress achieved “… when changes are made simultaneously in the economic, socio-political and cultural spheres …” And that sustainability is founded on wise use of our natural resources.

Our democracy is built on institutions intended to protect and empower citizens. But, more than a “common good of humanity,” democracy must be experienced as a dynamic instrument of development. People must be kept well informed and constructively engaged in the decision-making processes affecting their lives.

In this regard, free and fair elections while necessary are not sufficient. Beyond elections, robust mechanisms must be established to embed continuous, meaningful citizen participation in the deliberations and actions concerning public policy, institutional performance and effective delivery of public goods and services.

For public policy is everybody’s business, not the preserve of politicians. Committed action on these are vital for the health of our democracy and to ease feelings of discontent.

An informed citizenry, influential civil society and independent media are indispensable factors for this purpose.

Indeed, information and communication are critical triggers of popular interest and engagement.

They help us reflect on: Who defines the national interest? How are issues and messages about the national interest framed? What exactly is communicated to the public about the national policy agenda? Are arguments evidence-based or personality-determined? Does the political narrative engender or discourage public engagement? The media have a responsibility to candidly interpret the challenges confronting our society. They must not be seduced or intimidated by the rhetoric or posturing of politicians, of whatever ilk, whose instincts to remain in power often dominate all else.

Civil society, meanwhile, must be vigilant watchdogs over both politicians and media.

It must unearth the hidden agendas, underlying stories and evidence often lost in the pretence, and noise, of public debate.

Free and fair elections are imperative for consolidating our democracy. But they are not sufficient to guarantee that elected politicians will be responsive to the people. An active citizenry, enabled by durable participatory governance arrangements, and a public sector, imbued with a sense of professionalism, purpose, direction and accountability for performance, are essential elements of the solution required to resolve these problems.

WINSTON R RUDDER Petit Valley