New NIS pension from today

The National Insurance Board has adjusted the monthly pension payment for 47,551 NIS pensioners. The adjustment which takes effect today — October 1 — ensures a minimum NIS pension of $1,000 for each NIS pensioner.

The majority of pensioners received an increase to their existing monthly pension payment of 100 percent or more. The increase reflected the difference needed to ‘top up’ existing NIS pension payments to $1,000. The National Insurance Board has indicated that the total difference amounted to $27,831,480.78, and that the monthly expenditure for the new $1,000 pension will approximate $48 million, compared to approximately $20 million that was previously incurred each month.

NIB’s Executive Director, Jeffrey McFarlane, regards the increase as both necessary and timely, in keeping with the recommendations of the 6th Actuarial Review of the National Insurance System. McFarlane also pointed out that this increase was consistent with the Board’s own policy that pensions and other benefits must be relevant to contributors’ needs. He summised that “NIS pensioners can now better afford basic necessities and other consumables, which will in turn promote greater economic activity within Trinidad and Tobago.”

The NIS pension is the first of the National Insurance benefits to be increased. Effective November 1, 2003, claimants can look forward to increases to the maternity grant from $1,000 to $2,000; funeral grant from $2,000 to $4,000, and child allowance of $320 per child per month. Enhancements to other National Insurance benefits will take effect from January 4, 2004, according to a release from the NIB.

NAR TOBAGO IN DISARRAY

The Tobago arm of the National Alliance for Reconstruction (NAR) is in disarray.

This was obvious during a meeting of the party at Scarborough Secondary School Sunday evening which attracted fewer than 50 persons. Party members were openly critical, and harshly so, of the current Executive, with calls for its immediate removal and an interim body to be put in place. The party’s public relations officer (PRO) Jonathan Stone claimed that his functions were “taken away” from him by the current party chairman Christo Gift. Allegations and counter allegations were the order of the day with Stone subsequently walking out of the meeting and almost everyone having a problem with “washing the party’s dirty linen” in full glare of the two media representatives present.  All agreed there were serious problems affecting the party which must be addressed immediately if NAR Tobago is to survive.

It was suggested — and subsequently agreed — that a “closed-door meeting” be convened as soon as possible to allow everyone to freely “vent their feelings.” Before that, it was suggested that Gift  defer his address, the media be excused and a 45-minute “free-for-all” session be allowed, but there was no agreement on this. With proceedings waxing very warm, Stone, speaking from the floor, earlier enquired: “When will the time and the forum come when I will be able to state my grievances before the end of this year? Will that forum ever come into existence? And the way things are going I doubt it very much, that I will ever get an opportunity to do as Mr (Cecil) Caruth said earlier this evening: ‘let the healing begin.’” Alluding to many references  made to the party’s Constitution, Stone charged that “the Constitution of the NAR had been subverted from the very inception.” He said: “I have grievances, you know, people. I speak with emotion. I am saying that there is something radically wrong.” He claimed that different persons in the People’s National Movement (PNM) have also been trying to woo him, but stressed that his commitment was to the NAR.

Yet another well-known NAR activist, Nita Inniss, said people were afraid to openly associate with the NAR. A fellow member warned: “If we don’t move forward with the NAR we ain’t going nowhere!.” To which another added his voice: “If we don’t speed up the thing we will lose out!” Noting that “we hear about the NAR going forward,” a female member expressed displeasure over the manner in which the “problems” were aired publicly and summed it all up: “The first thing people would say is “you not ready!’”

Economist predicts $22 billion budget

Local Economist, Gregory Mc Guire, has projected a budget of approximately $22 billion for the 2003/2004 fiscal year based on oil prices of at least $25 or $26 per barrel.

He attributed these weaker oil prices, as compared to last year’s price of $31, to the current situation in post-war Iraq which, the International Monetary Fund predicts, could lead to volatility on the global market. Mc Guire, who is also manager, strategic planning, National Gas Company, was speaking yesterday at a seminar organised by the Trinidad and Tobago Economics Association on the hydrocarbon sector and its implication for the 2003/2004 budget.  Mc Guire said many predict that it will take as long as three years for Iraq to reach its previous capacity of 0.8 billion barrels per day, but the attitude of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), which recently cut its production capacity, was an indication that Iraq would catch up faster than anticipated. “The level of inventories at OPEC are such that if they do not cut production, it would create a surplus on the market,” he maintained.

This year he said was a highly positive one, with receipts for oil and gas standing at 33 percent higher than was expected. It would also appear that oil production was ten percent higher this year than last, which can be linked to additional compensatory production and additional associated production or oil associated with gas. A big factor, he added, was the fact that Government had based its previous budget on a $22 oil price, when in fact the realised price during the fiscal year stood at $31, which was 40 percent higher than the projected figure. “By rough calculations,” he maintained, “the combination of these two things would yield about $800,000,000. Mc Guire predicted that Government revenue would not only come from oil, but that a significant amount could be linked to the gas industry, especially in light of increased production of the Atlantic LNG Train 4 project.

A NATIONAL PROBLEM

Tobago’s illiteracy rate of 21 percent should be seen, not merely as a Tobago problem, but as a Trinidad and Tobago problem, which has to be addressed with urgency if it is not to be a frightening drag on the country’s development.

The description by University Lecturer, Dr Winford James, of the island’s illiteracy rate, as a scandal, holds good for the nation as a whole. In addition, his lecture on Monday last at the Tobago Literacy Unit seminar held at the Mt Irvine Bay Hotel on “The Role of Language and Literacy in the Development of Tobago in 2003-2012,” has served to point up a certain measure of neglect of Tobago by the Central Government. Hopefully, the relatively recent discovery of large reserves of natural gas as well as crude off the coast of the island, should, once they are properly exploited, assist in dismissing backward notions that Tobago is a literal orphan child of Trinidad, even as it provides additional revenue for education, health and social services, inter alia. Meanwhile, the notions are as arrogant and simplistic a belief, as should it be advanced for example that Port -of-Spain and other areas along North Trinidad’s East-West corridor are drones living off the energy-based South.

There is need for emphasis by the Ministry of Education on ensuring that not only the literacy rate of the entire nation, along with the upgrading of vocational skills, is such that the population, as a whole is better geared to meet the challenges posed by globalisation, generally, and those of the around the corner Free Trade Area of the Americas, specifically. And unless the minuses provoked by the illiteracy Dr James has pointed out, and a lack of vocational skills, and we may add management and entrepreneurial skills as well, are addressed then the FTAA may be ushered in without our being able to compete meaningfully. Education, along with skills development, is the key to Trinidad and Tobago’s, and by extension Caricom’s future. A society driven by the need to upgrade its efficiency will be better able to produce skilled welders, plumbers, masons, carpenters, as well as engineers, doctors, nurses, educators, scientists, architects, accountants, persons skilled in information technology than one that is “laissez-faire.’’

The high number of secondary, including comprehensive school dropouts in Trinidad as well as Tobago, many of them functionally illiterate and with neither definable skills nor the ability to learn skills much beyond basic levels, may present the country, in the short and medium term, with an uncomfortable pool of disgruntled citizens. Governments, largely for political reasons, also with the intent of painting an image of a bankable workforce as one of the arguments in the quest to attract potential foreign investors, have all too often fiddled on statistics with respect to the country’s literacy rate. It is a misrepresentation that may have been of some benefit several decades ago when Trinidad and Tobago struggled to bring down its level of unemployment. But measures used in the early days of “Pioneer Aid” industries are no longer applicable, as the literacy rate is only one of several factors by which many a country’s investor appeal is decided. Other factors include social stability, the level of skills development, including the availability of persons trained in specific skills, and, where relevant, energy resources. However, even though a country may have substantial resources, its social stability could be at risk or non existent if its illiteracy rate is such that it poses a threat to that stability, and therefore investor confidence, whether domestic or foreign. This is not to be construed that this is the situation in Tobago. Nonetheless, there is an urgent need to deal positively with what, after all, is a national problem.

Parliament’s concern is the people’s business

President George Maxwell Richards TC CMT PhD, President of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago gave the following speech at the opening of the Second Session of the Eighth Parliament of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, at the Parliament Chamber, Red House, yesterday.  He said:

We have convened in this awesome place, this hallowed hall that has witnessed so many important aspects of the evolution of our history. We have convened to fulfil a charge that has more than a civic dimension. We have convened to do the people’s business and this is a sacred trust, for government is of God. We have been placed in this Parliament as a privilege, with a mandate to be of service to a country that has seen the presence of God intervene in such ways as to leave no doubt in the mind of anyone but the obdurate that this country must have been set apart to fulfil a particular destiny. There are those who believe that they can define that destiny. Others are not convinced.

It could be said, with justification, that after 41 years of independence and 27 years as a republic, it is time for change. It is time to seek new systems of governance that will be better suited to our circumstances and our times. That may well be so.  But while we are at this stage, we ought to work with what we have in response to the confidence that has been demonstrated by the people who have elected us to seek their interest in this House. The paramount concern must be the people’s business. That is the purpose of this august body and place that we call Parliament. This is where, through reason and discussion, we must strive to foster and to uphold the dignity of the human being by way of legislative programmes, for example, that take account of matters of critical importance to the well-being of our citizens.

We must bear in mind that the people who have put us here have done so with great expectation of the betterment of their condition. We have been placed centre stage in the highest forum in the land on which the eyes and ears of the nation are focused. Our role then, is not just one of theatre as some might suppose, although the temptation may be great in that regard. It is one that should serve as an example. We must lead our people above the cut and thrust of commonplace politics to a level of understanding of nation building that will continue the work that was given even before we claimed and were given ownership of this Parliament. It was in this setting that our predecessors took up the challenge and with dignity — great dignity and sense of responsibility, took us from colonial territorial status to independence. Adversarial positions there were, without a doubt, but they, respecting their call to service, by and large, did not allow themselves to forget the requirement of respect for the representative role that was given to them.

There was no shortage of humour in the midst of serious debate; no lack of “picong,” that cherished national gift, but our people, particularly the youth, could be inspired by the quality of oratory and the regard for office that was manifest. May I humbly submit, esteemed Members of our nation’s Parliament, that we should pause, reflect and consider whether we have not somehow been distracted from what I regard as an opportunity for the development of statesmanship that no country can afford to eschew. I make this observation especially for the benefit of the children of our nation. For the sake of our children, we need to take a look at the path that we have been travelling and see whether some adjustments to our modus operandi are necessary. If they are, it is the duty of each one of us to make those adjustments. Much has already been done but much more needs to be done to take our country forward. But we continue the task of developing our country in a climate of increasing globalisation. We must realise that even as nations come together in their geographic groupings and are consolidating their economic blocs, there is evidence that simultaneously, bilateral activities are as vibrant as ever.

The reality is that in our international efforts, in whatever sphere, we are not assured of support even within our region. It has become clear that in a uni-polar world, many countries are constrained to yield to bilateral arrangements that seem best suited to their interests, if only in the short term, a position that we can well understand. Nevertheless, we must continue vigorously to strive for solidarity in our traditional groupings wherever this is possible. As we do so, however, we must be careful not to neglect those domestic issues that require the concerted effort of all the representatives of the people. We must work together in our Parliament to ensure that decisions are taken and laws enacted that reflect clear provision for the welfare of all of our people. If our laws do not insist upon fair opportunity for all, including the differently-abled and the poor, we can hardly count upon the ability or the willingness of the people to help us achieve the targets for development that we have set ourselves. Unlike many developing countries, our country has been endowed with tremendous natural resources. For this we can take no credit and we would do well to be mindful of the fact that the energy resources with which we are endowed are a wasting asset. Consequently, the laws that are put in place for their exploration and exploitation must reflect consideration for the generations to come as well as possible effects on our fragile environment.

The distribution of the national income is a matter to which careful consideration should also be given. This is an area in which there are no easy answers as there are legitimate demands all round. Moreover, we cannot legislate wealth nor industriousness, but systems may be put in place through laws that provide for ways of encouraging productive pursuits. Our communities cannot thrive without law and order. These are words that must be uppermost in the minds of all of us who are witnessing deterioration tending to anarchy in many of our institutions. There is no question but that the decline has reached alarming proportions. But where do the solutions lie? Is it in the passing of new laws in the Parliament? I think not. There are already many laws that are not enforced. I believe, rather, that law enforcement agencies must see to it that every infraction, no matter how small, is dealt with by the full force of the law. Am I advocating a police state? Not by any means. I am saying, however, that we have come to that point in our affairs where it has become necessary to apply discipline rigorously, in defence of our nation. Lawlessness in any form must not be tolerated and we the Members of this Parliament must do whatever lies in our power to encourage the upholding of the laws of the land.

Trinidad and Tobago has already proven that even as a small country, it is possible to make a difference in international affairs in the service of human beings everywhere, now and in the future. We do not need the validation from outside that we so often seek. We must recognise our own strengths. I question whether we are as conscious as we might be of the part that we can play to enhance our influence in world affairs. We are not insulated from world currents and so we must nurture a people who see themselves as patriots first, but also as contributors to the development of the outside world with which we have forward and backward linkages. It is the world in which our children must live and we owe it to them to make it better. That would require of us a mature understanding of the rules of conduct, if you will, for leaders. Our nation needs healing. In this Parliament, we must demonstrate far-sightedness. We must know when to put on battle gear and when to call a truce. We must be able to criticise and to congratulate. We must defend our interests and support the common good. We, the people of this Parliament, represent a beacon to which the rest of the nation looks for guidance. Let us, therefore, uphold high standards of which we can all be proud. May God bless our nation.

Stop that silly advertisement about crime in TT

THE EDITOR: The full-page advertisement by “the Prime Minister’s Committee against Crime” leaves me unimpressed; in fact, it makes me a bit angry! Addressing all citizens of TT in bold type, it says: “Together we have created a lawless, indisciplined society… so if you want to fix crime, fix yourself first.” The exhortation is: behave yourself and we have no problem! This is clearly an insult to all law-abiding citizens.

In a society where no angels tread, some citizens obey the laws, and some do not; but the taxpayer pays the elected Government to maintain law and order. What can the hapless motorist do, when while waiting for a green light, others are seen driving through, or making turns contrary to posted signs, or overtaking on the shoulders? What can the hapless citizen do, when the Government awards cushy contracts without tenders to selected supporters? A trini friend of mine and her Indian-born husband happened to be in Trinidad during the 1990 assault on Parliament, when Mr Robinson was shot, and 13 persons were killed. On the basis of the attempted coup by a handful of gunrunners, the husband remarked that TT is not a safe place. Mr Manning has not to date condemned Abu Bakr’s assault on our democratically elected government, and while Manning distances himself from the annual July 29 memorial service, he has no qualms in associating publicly with Abu Bakr.

Not only was Abu Bakr seen celebrating the PNM’s election victory at Baliser House in November 2002, but Manning also poses for the TV cameras when he receives Abu Bakr at his office. And to top it off, Manning then meets and treats in his office with leaders in areas noted for criminal activities, dubbing them “community leaders.” There are many upright citizens who are neither corrupt, nor do they break traffic laws; but Manning pussy-foots while the Integrity Commission lapses into a coma; the traffic police under his administration tolerate the lawlessness on our roads; and his ministers arrive for cabinet meetings in illegally tinted cars. Manning should phone Lee Quan Yew to find out what it took to make Singapore a first world nation in just 35 years. Does Manning possess the two vital attributes of manhood to do the job? The country voted for Manning’s Government and he has a mandate to govern. To occupy the Red House is his life’s ambition, but that apart, does he see any role for his 25-member Cabinet — such as fixing crime? Many citizens actually see the Manning Government as part of the crime problem! That advertisement should be withdrawn with an apology to the nation.


MICHAEL J WILLIAMS
Maracas Valley

Who upholds media law?

THE EDITOR: Obscene language remains illegal in Trinidad and Tobago. Yet during Saturday night’s movie (September 27) at 10.20 pm on TV 6, obscene language was being used. Who is to uphold the law against obscene language by the media?

Usually the media responds that the viewer is free to switch off the TV set. But is the programme manager not responsible for ensuring that the laws are not broken when shows are offered? We are quick to condemn youthful law breakers when irresponsible media presentations develop lawlessness among viewers. I call on those responsible for monitoring the media to take action now.


PRAMSU LAL
Chaguanas

I was humiliated in Chaguanas

THE EDITOR: I wish to inform you and the public about an unfortunate incident that occurred at a store in Chaguanas last Friday evening. I was shopping and looking for a few items, when I entered the store, and while looking around, I realised that the guard at the store had been watching my every move, probably because of the way that I was dressed.

I ignored it at first but after a while I started to feel uncomfortable. On exiting the store with the items that I had just bought, I was stopped by the guard, who started to search the bags and demanded to see the bill. Even though he saw the bill, he proceeded to search me as if I had stolen something and the cashier who had just sold me these items watched him and said nothing. This was a great embarrassment to me because other people were passing and watching at the manner in which he was handling me. I had been left outside the store emotional and confused. If anything could be done about this incident I would be most grateful.


MICHAEL HENRY
Balmain
Couva

The UTC, FCB merger embroiled in politics

THE EDITOR: Our power-hungry politicians are at it once again; flexing their muscles with utterances that can be deemed deplorable and defiant. This posturing can only lead to disaffection in the general public and anxiety in the business community.

I am alluding to the Prime Minister’s insensitive and high-handed approach regarding the extension of Clarry Benn’s tenure as CEO of UTC and the persistent talk about the merging of UTC with FCB. Let’s address the extension issue affecting Clarry Benn, CEO of UTC first. The PM remarked that the policy in the public service was that persons ought to retire when they reach retirement age unless there were overriding considerations which suggest otherwise. He elaborated, “In the case of UTC, we do not identify such overriding considerations.” (To quote him verbatim.) Consequently, Clarry Benn was given an additional six-months extension which the PM said should give the Board time to appoint someone else. When the PM chooses to make these inflammatory utterances, froth with rancour and disdain he should at least “smile” so that we would all be aware of the fact that he is only joking. The PM should take the human anatomy very seriously in that we were created with two ears and one mouth; as a result we are expected to listen more than we speak. Having said that, I hasten to point out to the PM an overriding consideration favouring Clarry Benn, which highlights why he should be treated with more dignity and respect. Under Benn’s stewardship, UTC leaped from assets of $1.3 billion in 1996 to $10 billion in 2003. This phenomenal feat was accomplished in just seven years, without acquisitions of any sort. With regard to the UTC/FCB merger (why kill the goose that lays the golden egg?) FCB may deal with mutual funds, but that alone does not make it an investment enterprise, it still remains for all practical purposes a bank. While UTC has proven itself as a well managed, successful investment enterprise for a number of years, FCB evolved from mergers involving three struggling banks in 1993 and currently manages assets of over $11 billion.

No one in his right mind, whether he may be an MBA or CEO can make a strong case for the merging of FCB with assets of $11 billion accrued in ten years, with the infusion of assets from three failed banks, with UTC with its mercurial achievements — the accumulation of assets from $1.3 billion to $10 billion in seven years. Mergers are only necessary when an organisation is not well managed, and as a consequence is doomed to failure and ultimate bankruptcy precipitating “a takeover” by a much stronger company or enterprise.  If both institutions are “solid and strong,” just to quote Larry Howai, CEO of FCB, why entertain a merger? Where does the need arise? Which organisation would carry the allotted name without credibility and image problems? Our present Government and governments in the future should consider divestiture of all business enterprises, because of Govern-ment’s bad track record in controlling business ventures. Their activities and involvement should be limited to the enforcement of laws dealing with monopolies, the settling of labour disputes and overt civil problems in the workplace. The UTC/FCB merger smirches the fine accomplishment of UTC CEO Clarry Benn and the bickering over the continuation of his tenure, even after it was approved by the UTC Board of Directors. On the issue of politics clouding the matter, here is how a first rate country deals with sensitive matters that can affect a great number of people. Allan Greenspan, the present head of the US Federal Reserve, an avowed member of the Republican political party, was allowed to serve for two terms under President Clinton a Democrat.  Greenspan at this point in time, is well into his mid-seventies. One is left to believe that TT would come to an end if Benn were to receive a full tenure, and if the impending merger between UTC/FCB were to be scrubbed.


ULRIC GUY
Point Fortin

Uncaring Minister of Health

THE EDITOR: Anyone responsible for the health care system of a nation should be endowed with the spirit of compassion; moreso, if the political party he belongs to projected an image of caring in their election campaign. That person should respect the value of human life, especially when it comes to sickness and disease.

Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, Mr Colm Imbert displayed none of these attributes when questioned by reporters on the deaths of several babies at Mount Hope. His typical response was the “skin and grin” cynicism that the nation has become accustomed to. His behaviour was reminiscent of the sarcasm he heaps on the opposition and on MPATT. He never misses an opportunity to trivialise and belittle. This behaviour is surely not the way our Minister of Health, who since December 2001 has been batting with a coconut bat, should deport himself, and is really a crying shame on the government. Similar behaviour by government ministers was justifiably criticised and condemned in the recent past. Imbert, at the post cabinet media meeting, expressed no empathy for the parents, especially the mothers of those babies, while the sanctimonious prime minister made no attempt to correct him. Personally, I hope the Cuban doctors and nurses witnessed Imbert’s sardonic attitude and will soon decipher the true character of this Minister of Health.


JUDY GOSEIN
Harmony Hall