Labour costs ‘not the only lure’

Low labour costs don’t necessarily attract investors. The assertion came from Henry Gill, senior director of the Regional Negotiating Machinery (RNM) as he addressed a workshop on trade, hosted by the Barbados Private Sector Trade Team (BPSTT), in association with the Small Business Association (SBA) and the Barbados Investment and Development Corporation (BIDC). Speaking on competitiveness, Gill said: “High-cost labour is not a disadvantage in itself but you have to link it with productivity. Some people say that cheap labour is going to bring in investment, but that is not necessarily the case.”  In fact, he described cheap labour as “a sign of low human resource development and a sign of low productivity.” Gill, who is one of the region’s lead negotiators at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), argued that there are many cases where international companies invested in the Caribbean, not because of low cost labour but because the labour force was trainable.

The high capacity of the region’s workforce to absorb training is seen as one of its greatest assets. The RNM senior official also offered the Barbadian entrepreneurs some recommendations on how to be more competitive in a globalised market. He warned that it was time for Caribbean governments to hold national consultations to “identify in the society and the economy the various elements that make for non-competitiveness,” whether they be telecommunications, transport or ports. After the elements have been identified, they needed to be prioritised and time frames for action established. “If we can do that then we will start to get somewhere. So that you will have an environment that will be conducive to competitiveness and that will go hand in hand with what you are doing at the human resource level,”  he noted. Gill reminded the audience that the economies of many Caribbean islands relied heavily on services even though the populations cannot conceive how this is so.  “This is a service economy as a share of GDP ‘gross domestic procuct’, as the source of most of your foreign exchange . . . and this is good. You don’t have to produce something that can fall on your toe to be rich, in this day and age. The Cayman Islands is rich and they don’t produce anything that can fall on your toe – just services,” he added.

Ruction at Vale View

TO WHAT extent, if any, do agencies which approve building projects monitor the progress of such construction works? We ask the question in light of the severe inconvenience which residents of Vale View Terrace, St Lucien Road, Diego Martin are now experiencing as a result of the building of an apartment complex on the steep slope above them. Owner and developer of the land Mr Gowkaran Mahabir claims that he has the permission of the EMA, Town and Country Planning and WASA to carry out the private project but because of the major problems which the hillside construction work is creating for residents below we must wonder about the purpose and effectiveness of such approvals.

Surely the responsibility of these agencies, particularly the EMA and Town and Country, do not end when they issue certificates of approval to land developers. The proposed development is supposed to proceed according to certain conditions laid down by these bodies but, we must now ask, what mechanism or system do they have in place to ensure that these conditions are followed? Do they have inspectors who monitor the progress of these projects by regular visits? MP for the area Mr Colm Imbert himself has expressed concern about the Vale View development and is seeking to find out whether approval for the project was given, by whom and, if so, whether the contractor is acting in compliance with EMA guidelines. Mr Imbert observed that contractors were responsible for putting in place temporary systems to ensure that no mess, no drainage problems and no inconvenience to nearby residents takes place. “This project is clearly not in compliance with that” he remarked.

Several weeks ago, this newspaper questioned the wisdom of permitting developers to clear and denude semi-forested hillsides to build residences since it would aggravate or increase the risk of flooding when the rains come. Because of the cutting into the Vale View hillside, residents of the lower areas now fear inundation by mud slides during the wet season now beginning. But apart from that, the various aggravations of the construction have become quite annoying. Trucks enter private roads without permission, park on public roadways and block entrances to side streets and home garages. On Friday night, trucks and bulldozers on St Lucien road caused a major traffic jam from Sierra Leone Road to Wendy Fitzwilliams Boulevard. For several months heavy bulldozers have been pounding the sidewalk on St Lucien Road in order to climb the narrow hillside path to the construction site. On Sunday one resident discovered that the massive machines had broken her solid two-year-old concrete wall but, we are told, the developers refused to acknowledge responsibility for the damage.

Residents complain that work on the project starts early every day, including Sundays, finishing late at nights and the noise of the heavy equipment has become almost unbearable. One Vale View family now fear for the safety of their home on which they have already done costly repairs. Indira and Keith Mitchell have written to all the authorities and their representative about the danger to their house. They are also asking for access to their home, the ability to get in and out without being stuck in mud, for their peace of mind and the security of their family. Why should one development which appears questionable in the first place be permitted to create such distress among nearby residents who say they are unable to get even the cooperation of the Police? Somebody must be responsible for protecting a peaceful neighbourhood from this kind of disturbing invasion.

Need for return of rail service


THE country’s rail service, which often transported on a single route as many passengers as 150 route taxis or 15 to 18 buses, should never have been abandoned by Government. In turn, had it been operating today, on say between Port-of-Spain and Arima, and Port-of-Spain and San Fernando, the service would have reduced the need for so many heavy-duty transport vehicles on main roads between Port-of-Spain and some of the nation’s principal industrial estates.

Indeed, a great deal of today’s traffic jams, in which trucks, buses, maxi taxis, private cars and route taxis jostle each other for the rapidly dwindling space on the nation’s main arteries can be placed at the injudicious decision to do away with the trains. The introduction of free secondary school education in 1961, based on the results of the then Common Entrance Examination, meant that thousands of primary schoolchildren, from lower income families living along the East West Corridor, Central and South Trinidad, saw a widened opportunity to attend so-called prestige schools in Port-of- Spain. And instead of the relative handful of Government Exhibitions, which had allowed brighter children access to these schools, the door to a chance at upward mobility had opened to thousands more. In addition, scores of elementary pupils living in Central Trinidad and even in North Trinidad would name as their choices “prestige” secondary schools in San Fernando.  This resulted in a sharp increase in demand for transportation to Port-of-Spain and San Fernando, which would be compounded by criss crossing. The introduction of the School Bus Service by the Public Transport Service Corporation in 1966 on direction from Prime Minister Dr Eric Williams meant the shifting of units from regular routes, even as the School Bus Service failed to meet the new demand.

 The massive secondary school building programme, which began in the early 1970s, saw the demand for transportation spiralling. A new problem arose in 1974, which would confuse the issue. The PTSC, humbugged by a multitude of negatives, would be plagued by a drop in the run out position, which affected both the Open and School Bus Services. Of the 368 buses allocated by the Corporation to its stations in Port-of-Spain, San Fernando, Sangre Grande and Point Fortin, there was a monthly average run out position in 1974 of 154, or 41.8 percent! The abandoning of the rail service was felt keenly, not simply by the Corporation, but by the tens of thousands of working adults and even schoolchildren who sought its services. The point has to be made that even the schoolchildren suffered, as the school bus allocation proved insufficient in light of sharply increased demand created by free secondary education and the school building programme it had triggered. Millions of man hours were lost annually, and millions of dollars were lost either as a result of adversely affected productivity or in docked wages. School classes were also hit, what with scores of pupils turning up late for classes. Teachers were faced with the problem of either going over already handled classwork, in which case those who turned up early suffered, or going ahead, regardless, in which case the latecomers lost out.

Here was a case made out by events for a return of the rail service, as gradually the roads became clogged with maxi taxis (mini buses), which would be introduced, and four and five-passenger conventional taxis. Each day saw scores of persons, adults and schoolchildren standing along various routes waiting, all too many in vain, for transport. The lack of transport, particularly with the School Bus Service, which is generally accepted as an integral part of the education process, contributed to the demotivating of many of the nation’s schoolchildren. The rail service in its heyday operated not merely a commuter service for adult and school- bound passengers, but a freight service as well, lifting tonnes of equipment and construction material for the oil industry, manufacturers and developers. The real problem with the railways that led to its induced poor performance in the 1960s lay in a hardly concealed policy by Government of allowing it to run down. There was little or no marketing in the first two years of the Corporation. And even after the Public Transport Service Corporation, which had been given the responsibility of operating the old Trinidad Government Railways as a mere department, established a Public Relations Department, the Head of Public Relations would be dissuaded from marketing the rail schedules and services, and persuaded to market only the bus service.

A properly equipped rail service and bus service could have existed, and could co-exist today, with each contributing to the economic and social development of the country. A commuter train, depending on the number of carriages used, was, at the high point of rail, capable of transporting several hundred passengers at a time, and the average large bus would tend to have a maximum adult seating capacity of less than 50. So that a train, with a 600-passenger capacity, for the sake of argument, depending of course on the number of carriages used, if full could in essence absorb all of the passengers carried by the equivalent of 120 five-seater or 150 four-passenger route taxis.  In turn, a 46-seater bus could absorb all of the passengers that nine five-seater taxis could handle. Admittedly, the railway would have had to be subsidised by Government, although such subsidy could have been substantially reduced through the acquiring of new rolling stock and an adequate supply of replacement parts.  But the enhanced productivity in the workplace and the classroom would have more than made up for any subsidy. Today, in the absence of the rail service, the country loses untold tens of millions of dollars annually in lost time caused by interminable traffic jams. Recently there has been increasing talk of operating an electric rail service, along the Priority Bus Route, laid down on the old railway bed,  the first phase of which was in 1976.  If implemented, it will complement the Priority Bus Service and provide transport positives, ending or substantially easing the negatives of the past several decades.

Woman’s mind in man’s body

THE EDITOR: I am an actively religious person. As a person who has a strong connection with God I would like to say that any religion is based on love. Marriage be it heterosexual or homosexual is about loving someone. In these modern times where everybody “horning” everybody else you don’t know who you can trust. It is very difficult to find true love and be happy. If a person has found that, who are we to say that is wrong. A few decades ago the “white men” believed that the “black man” was an animal not even human, they believed that they were put on this planet to serve them. If you asked them they could also show where in the Bible that God said “black people” are not human. We all know that is not true but back then that was the way of life. Just as people now are putting down homosexuals.

A study by MTV showed that 80 percent of teenage boys who kill themselves is because they are gay. From a young age our society has drilled into our heads that homosexuality is wrong. These young boys and girls who are homosexuals have to live every day hearing that they are disgusting, they are filth, they are called “faggots” or “dykes”, they are told the love they are feeling is wrong when they can’t love in any other way. What are their options? Do you know what it is like to get up every morning going out into a world that hates you, despises the ground you walk on? Do you know what it is like to hear the person you love deny that you are in a relationship? Do you know what it is like to finally find someone you love and have to end it because you’re scared someone will find out?

This is not something you can control, it is just how you are. A study done by the Discovery Channel shows you can be born with an imbalance in other words you can have the mind of a woman but the body of a man. This world is too cruel, hurtful and harsh. If one person can find happiness in it without hurting any of the others why should we stand in their way. It may be wrong, who knows, but who are we to judge; the only one who can is God. When judgment Day arrives who do you think will be wrong, a man for loving a man or you for hating/ridiculing your fellow man? The world we have made for ourselves is not a nice one. I pray to God for more love and understanding for everyone. This world already has too much hate. A little love can go a long way.


R SEEMUNGAL
Port-of-Spain

Get foreign doctor for local poison

THE EDITOR: What is it going to take to stem the reckless murder spree plaguing TT? Clearly, the ones in power are clueless with regard to the answer. Imagine 13 murders in 14 days, all in the midst of political picong, a jesting Parliament and downright complacency. We the people must realise that the Government and the Opposition have their own agenda. Make no mistake — seeking the population’s foremost interest is indubitably a low priority item — an afterthought even. Call this an extreme conclusion but a quick look at the facts puts things into perspective.

Hundreds of appeals have been and continue to be made to the Administration regarding crime, many with reasonable proposals for a resolution. Almost daily I read opinions and suggestions from scared and fed-up citizens. They are begging for an end to the madness, for relief from the gang warfare and an inept police force that is instructed by an apparently daft Commissioner and a dubious Minister of National Security by extension. Any normal 10-year-old would agree that the element of surprise is key in entrapment. So why would a National Security Minister or Police Commissioner publicly announce when and where armed forces would be deployed to ensnare criminals? That move is tantamount to hunting deer and shouting, “OK deer, ready or not here I come!” We have confirmed that the skills used to manage a nightclub cannot be used to manage crime.

News reports have time and time again allied an infamous seditious group with the incidence of heinous crimes. Many citizens harbour frightening thoughts and nightmares of the police and/or Government officials being in cohorts with these insurrectionists who hide behind religion. Other law-abiders believe that the group has law enforcers wrapped around their fingers, making the entire nation their turf. For me, I often wonder about the percentage of mentally challenged or brain dead members in Parliament. Whether or not these concerns and beliefs are credible, the fact remains that TT is in crisis. Ole’ talk and reaction is not helping. As difficult as it is to hear, the nation is presently unable to produce a competent and just administration with a workable and effective anti-crime plan. Crime is “the” major societal poison for which we have no antidote. Mr Manning, swallow your pride and seek out a foreign doctor.


PERNELL TRANTON
Port-of-Spain

I left my heart in TT

THE EDITOR: Hi! I was staying in Trinidad for three years and I left to head back to Malaysia last year. I miss your country and it is great to still hear about the goings on in Trinidad even though I am millions of miles away, nevertheless my heart is still there! Missing the bake and shark, the roti, callaloo, oh gosh the Sunday meals etc. Anyway, I am so glad to get Newsday on the Net and as I mentioned earlier, it would be great to have more photos. I like the layout as it is very clear and easy to read. Keep it up!


ALICIA J HERRERA
Port-of-Spain

Indian music is also part of Trini culture

THE EDITOR: It is difficult to keep emotions in check when the PRO of Pan Trinbago manifests his animosity for Indian culture. This politically opportunist organisation, Pan Trinbago, apparently not satisfied with receiving prodigious financial support from the NLCB and government, feels that other self-interest groups have no right to speak out against this transgression, and that Sat Maharaj should be stymied.

A musical instrument does not have to be invested in a country to become an inherent part of that country’s culture. Music, with its many variations and styles, is a universal language. The auspicious violin, for example, was not invented in India, but any ardent lover of Indian music knows of the dominant role this instrument plays in many a Bollywood movie song. The incomparable violinist, Anslem Walters, successfully participated in the 2002 Mastana Bahar series and received much acclaim. Is Felix Roach less of a Trini because he plays the piano and not the pan? Unique instruments as the dholak, dhantal, sitar and harmonium came to our blessed land 158 years ago and are not intrinsic to the musical tastes and talents of a significant portion of our population. They are deeply entrenched in the music of the entire Indian diaspora, which includes Trinidad and Tobago. Their mesmerising sounds have reverberated across this land for a century and a half, long before the steelpan was invented.

Trini culture is not homogenous! For Mr Austin to flippantly discredit these divine instruments and ostracise them from our Trini culture is blatant racism. The PRO of Pan Trinbago accused Sat Maharaj, who extols the excellence of these instruments, of creating racial inharmony. Yet, it is Austin, with typical arrogance, who hints at the annihilation of Indian music and culture. His zany, preposterous belief that racial harmony means that everyone must love and support only pan, calypso, and carnival, is bigoted. He is the one who perpetuates racial tension. The misconception that Indian music is not part of Trini culture must be debunked once and for all. The graceful rhythms of Indian music have blessed this land for decades since 1845, a century before the advent of the steelband. The mellifluous sounds of the dholak, dhantal, sitar and harmonium have warmed the heart of Indo-Trinis who love these beautiful instruments, and have adapted them to our unique style of music.

It is time that Austin and the executive of Pan Trinbago realise that the dholak, dhantal, sitar, and harmonium are here to stay, like Indian Arrival Day, the five Indian radio stations, Mastana Bahar, Pichakaree, and Miss Fem India. “You understand, breds?” As a taxpaying citizen, Sat Maharaj has every right to expose the immense disparity of monetary aid between certain cultural groups, and Indian organisations. He has every right to implore that this inequity be corrected so that Pan Trinbago and others will not be the only ones to receive colossal aid, while Indian culture has to make do with pittance. As taxpaying citizens Indians who love their culture and heritage are entitled to an equal share of the pie, as they are part of the cultural potpourri that is Trinidad and Tobago. It is time that the government and the NLCB learn to appreciate the psyche of the Indo-Trini. The NLCB and its administrators must assist their musical talents and skills to bring them within the parameters of the nation, for the good of the nation.

SHIVANNA DIPNARINE for
Women Against Racism and Dictatorship

Bad Umpires should be disciplined

THE EDITOR: Australia’s tour of the Caribbean is now over. Congratulations go out to both teams for providing us cricket fans with some fantastic cricket. Australia won both the Test series 3-1 and the one day series 4-3.

I would like to comment briefly on the umpiring department in both versions of the game. Umpires make wrong decisions from time to time. They are all human and no one is perfect. This is the era when modern technology is much advanced. Why is that punishment is only meted out to players and not umpires? Who are on the so-called elite panel? Players who show dissent after being dismissed, or any form of unsportsman like behaviour on or off the field of play are punished by the match referee. They are fined a percentage of thematch fee. In some instances they are even reported to the International Cricket Council (ICC) which is based in London, England for further disciplinary action.

In my personal opinion, umpires who are on the elite panel and who make too many wrong decisions should be debarred from umpiring in at least three matches.  FIFA, the soccer world governing body, punishes referees when they make certain errors on the field of play. One can remember that very infamous World Cup qualifying match involving TT and Haiti in 1973 where the referee was banned for life. I can also recall an incident in a match during the World Cup soccer tournament in France involving Italy and Chile, where the referee who was from Kuwait, awarded a penalty in the dying minutes of the game. The match ended in a 2-2 draw. Chile should have won the match 2-1. This match was played at the Star Velodrome in Marseille. FIFA intervened and he was immediately expelled from taking any further part in the tournament.

To Brian Lara, the captain of the WI Cricket team, congratulations on winning three consecutive one day matches against the Aussies, “the World Champions.” The one day series against the visiting Sri Lanka has already been lost. Good luck in the Test series. Hope to see some improvement in the umpiring department.


RICKIE ELDER
San Juan

Support for my criticism of Einstein

THE EDITOR: This past month, the international journal Physics Essays published one of my papers in which I argue that Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity (GTR), which asserts that acceleration produces gravity, is wrong. (See the website address     www.eng.uwi.tt/depts/elec/staff/sgift/FRAME.htm). 

This marks a milestone in my research as I have been advancing the case against Einstein for the past 15 years, but have only now obtained an international hearing.  Of course, publication of my paper does not necessarily mean that I am right, but it does indicate that the reviewers of my paper, who are qualified physicists, were sufficiently persuaded to have recommended its publication. In 1988, when at a seminar in the Physics Department at the University of the West Indies (UWI) I first presented my case against GTR in which I argued that acceleration does not produce gravity, there seemed to be silent agreement that I was wrong, even though no one could identify the error in my argument.

 Later that year at a lecture in the Engineering Faculty at UWI before a large agitated audience, there was more overt disagreement with a few being openly hostile.  Today, GTR is just as revered as it was then but apart from the publication of my paper, there is now a growing group of international physicists who like me consider the theory to be invalid. I wish to place on record my deep appreciation for the considerable support I have received and continue to receive from members of the public in Trinidad and Tobago.  Many individuals, some of whom I do not know, have expressed  admiration for my efforts, seemingly fascinated by the idea that someone in this country could dare to challenge the international scientific community. I have come to the realisation that my actions involved much risk as those in the pastwho have questioned mainstream ideas have usually paid a high price for so doing. Dr Paul Marmet of the University of Ottawa was a respected physicist until he questioned the orthodox explanation for quantum mechanics. Dr Halton Arp, an accomplished professional astronomer was forced out of the United States because he reported observations that contradicted the big bang theory.

In this country there are those who believe that my open disagreement with relativity theory makes me unfit to teach at the University. In the face of this antagonism, I suspect that my real contributions in Electrical Engineering have helped to shield me from such intolerance. I have devoted considerable time and effort in carefully examining the issues involved before drawing the conclusions that I have.  With the publication of my paper, I feel some level of vindication. I have since turned my attention to Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity (STR) which deals with high-speed phenomena.  This aspect of relativity theory, which underpins most of modern physics, asserts that light travels at the same speed, regardless of the motion of the observer.  Thus, according to STR, if a traffic light some distance away emits a flash of light, an individual standing on the roadway will measure exactly the same light speed as a motorist traveling towards the traffic light. This idea, sometimes referred to as Einstein’s Principle of Light Propagation, is contrary to the common sense expectation that the motorist, because of his movement towards the traffic light, would measure a higher light speed than the individual. I have thoroughly investigated this claim and have come to the inescapable conclusion that this principle, though universally accepted, is nevertheless false; the motorist will measure a higher light speed. STR, like GTR, is therefore invalid.

As we approach the 100th year since the introduction of the theory of relativity in 1905, while significant scientific progress has been made, I am of the view that considerable more could have been accomplished but for science’s embrace of a relativistic worldview. After many years of research, I see the flaws in this theory with a clarity that makes me wonder how a century of brilliant scientists could have been and continue to be fooled by a theory that to me is so obviously wrong! Yours sincerely,

DR STEPHEN GIFT
Senior Lecturer

Shoot to stop the attacker

THE EDITOR: The suggestion by Acting Inspector Christopher Holder to police officers that they should shoot to kill, demonstrate the lack of training in the use of deadly force by our police officers. As a certified instructor in the use of deadly force, I feel obliged to inform police officers, armed security guards and legally armed civilians that when you use a firearm to protect yourself from death or grievous bodily harm, you must shoot to stop the attacker from hurting you or carrying out his threat.

You do not shoot to kill. To purposely aim for a vital part of the body in order to kill an attacker, will take up valuable time, and since most gunfights are over in five seconds, with three shots being fired at a distance of three to ten feet, the chances of being hurt by the attacker is much greater. It is in this context that it would make sense to shoot at an attacker in the largest part of the body, that is the torso, and continue shooting until the threat is over. Remember it is not your intention to kill, but to merely to stop an attacker from hurting you.

If the attacker dies, that is his problem, he started it. The proper training in the use of deadly force is what police officers, armed security guards and legally armed citizens have not gone through, and this is reflected in their attitude, loss of firearms and lives. It is therefore essential that anyone who carries a firearm for defensive purposes, should avail themselves of such training in order to use a firearm in the safe, correct and proper manner. On the issue of allowing police officers to carry their firearms off duty, this is a very good idea, provided the proper training in alertness and awareness, defensive mindset, tactical use of a firearm, combat readiness, multiple target engagement and the proper use of deadly force is taught to them. Having the necessary training would be an asset to these officers when they are armed, off duty, and on the streets.


ARRUN MAHARAJ
Southern Firearm Training Centre