The real Rama
Hinduism it has been often said, has no one founder and is not based on any single individual. Many of the incarnations of God such as Lord Krishna and Lord Rama have also been described as “mythological figures.” This has encouraged many to develop a school of anti-Hindu thought that likens Hinduism to a flight of fantasy. In a recent Times News exposition Sunit Bezbaroowa and Arvind Joshi (Saturday November 8 2003) declared that Lord Rama was real and not a Hindu mythological figure.
"Ram was and is for real. He was born on January 10, 5114 BCE," Saroj Bala, IRS, Commisioner of Income Tax says, calmly, with the assurance of one who has tangible facts. Taking on the contemporary historical interpretation of Ramayana as a religio-literary text, and Lord Ram as a semi-mythical figure, is this unassuming person who zealously devotes her spare time to research in history when she's not playing the tax mandarin. And she has chosen the unusual combination of astronomy, Internet and literary texts to provide us a startling picture of Shri Ram. This might change the way we look at history and religion. We might refuse to begin reading Indian history from that comma, or hyphen called “Indus Valley.” We might have to stretch the beginnings by a few thousand years because, as Saroj Bala says — Ram was born on January 10, 5114 BCE.
Excerpts of an interview with the lady who has the intellectual courage to go beyond the obvious: "What got it all started. As an amateur historian, I've always been interested in Indian culture and heritage. I am proud that we're Indians and the products of one of the oldest civilisations. However, British rule changed us; we developed a sense of being somehow inferior. But I could never reconcile to theories like the theory of Aryan invasion to India in 1500 BC. That would make Indian civilisation only 3,500 years old. And if you choose archaeology to dig beyond 7,000 years, you'd have to dig more than 60 metres — something not being done in India as yet. So, archaeology is not the only answer. There's a lot of objective research of another kind that needs to be carried out in earnest.
"So, how can we say Ram was born on January 10, 5114 BCE. My colleague Pushkar Bhatnagar of Indian Revenue Service is the real originator of this theory. He acquired a software named Planetarium, used to predict planetary movements and configurations. By entering in this software, precise details of planetary positions vis-?-vis zodiac constellations described by Maharishi Valmiki in the Valmiki Ramayan, it is possible to determine important dates starting from Shri Ram's birth-date to the date of his return to Ayodhya."
More than just Ram's date-of-birth. The results have not just thrown up Shri Ram's date-of-birth; it has actually traced the entire sequence of incidents throughout Ramayan. Pushkar Bhatnagar starts with tracing Ram's birth. Then he moves ahead in the narrative. Valmiki Ramayan states Ram was 25-years-old when he went to exile. When the configuration of planets described at this point is fed into the software, the date thrown up matches perfectly with Ram's age at that juncture of his life — 25 years. Again in the 13th year of Ram's exile, during a warwith Khar and Dushan, Valmiki describes a solar eclipse. The software proves that on that given day there was indeed a solar eclipse (with Mars in the middle). This solar eclipse and the particular configuration of planets could be seen from Panchavati (longitude and latitude plainly shown in the software).
Hanuman saw eight constellations while flying to Lanka. In the Sunderkand, when Valmiki describes Hanuman crossing the sea and returning from Lanka to Rameshwaram, he gives details of eight constellations. Usually, one can see not more than six constellations at a given point of time. But since Hanuman was flying across, and it must have taken him approximately four hours to get there, he could see eight constellations - in two hours one constellation would have moved out of sight and another become visible. So, in a period of four hours he saw eight constellations!
"Historicising Shri Ram. Man or God. After researching on Shri Ram, I do believe he's a man who walked the earth in flesh and blood. There is an essential difference between the Valmiki Ramayana and the Tulsi Ramayana. Tulsidas was a devotee who looked up to Ram, but Valmiki was a contemporary. Valmiki has written Ram's life-history, as a biographer does — he's a contemporary of Ram, and this is not very different from what happens all over the world. Kings have always had their life-history written." The submerged bridge. Recently, NASA had put pictures on the Internet of a man-made bridge, the ruins of which are submerged in Palk Strait between Rameshwaram and Sri Lanka. This clearly should be treated as historical evidence that corroborates its mention in Valmiki Ramayana.
The puzzle of Indian history. The presence of Ramayana, Mahabharata and Vedas cannot be explained by the short period between the decline of the Indus valley civilisation and the Rig Vedic period. A civilisation cannot suddenly burst into advanced writing. One needs to look at various sources of history to re-build it. Especially when looking at ancient history. One needs to excavate, look at literature, ancient texts, and astronomy.
Comments
"The real Rama"